Half of nation’s clean energy comes from nuclear. But new nuclear looks very, very expensive
A Colorado legislative committee is scheduled on Jan. 24 to take up a proposal to classify nuclear energy as a clean resource
The bill submitted by Sen. Larry Liston, a Republican from El Paso County, proposes to add nuclear to the list of clean energy resources previously reserved to biomass, geothermal, solar, small hydroelectricity, and wind – as well as hydrogen derived from these.
Liston’s bill, SB24-039, points out that nuclear currently provides half of the carbon-free electricity in the United States, and that nuclear energy has a capacity factor that is 2 to 3 times higher than wind energy and 4 to 5 times higher than solar energy. Capacity factor is a measure of how much of the time the plant is operating at full power.
This higher capacity factory – sometimes called baseload – will allow it to integrate with “weather-dependent and seasonally variable wind and solar generation, mitigating the potential for brownouts and blackouts in Colorado.”
The bill speaks to ‘’high-quality and high-paying jobs” that nuclear can deliver and to the piggybacking Colorado can achieve with federal funding with this reclassification.
The bill has no co-sponsors from either party, which suggests it has a short life.
See also: Nuclear is on the table in Colorado.
Why support Big Pivots?
You need and value solid climate change reporting, and also the energy & water transitions in Colorado. Because you know that strong research underlies solid journalism, and research times take.
Plus, you want to help small media, and Big Pivots is a 501(c)3 non-profit.
Big grants would be great, but they’re rare for small media. To survive, Big Pivots needs your support. Think about how big pivots occur. They start at the grassroots. That’s why you should support Big Pivots. Because Big Pivots has influence in Colorado, and Colorado matters in the national conversation.