Two county commissioners spar on what had been agreed to in filing with PUC and third commissioner is silent in the matter

 

by Allen Best

Velma Campbell, a physician in Pueblo specializing in public health, particularly occupational and environmental health, stood before the Pueblo County commissioners on Thursday morning and made a plea.

Would they immediately and emphatically repudiate the filing that had been made on their behalf the prior Friday to the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. In that filing to the PUC, Pueblo County had said they would seek the intervention of President Donald Trump to continue burning coal at the Comanche Generating Station.

Comanche 2 is scheduled to close at the end of 2025 while the final unit, Comanche 3, is to wind down operations but remain open through 2030.

While they were at it, added Campbell, would the commissioners adopt a resolution supporting the promotion of renewable energy and related industry?

The filing with the PUC on Aug. 29 said this:

“Pueblo County is in the process of requesting that President Trump and Secretary Wright order that Comanche 2 remain in operation beyond its closure date which is scheduled for the end of 2025 and further requesting that the capacity restrictions of Comanche 3 be removed and that he orders that Comanche 3 and 2 remain open until replacement generation is constructed in Pueblo.”

Campbell left without getting the repudiation of that statement that she sought and the resolution in support of renewable energy.

All three commissioners variously agreed that they were unhappy with how the PUC has handled Pueblo’s fate as it has considered what comes next for Xcel Energy, the operator and primary owner of the units. (CORE Electrical Cooperative and Holy Cross Energy own portions of Comanche 3).

Nobody denied that Pueblo’s future is in doubt. The Comanche Generation Station has been responsible for 10% of the county’s budget. Xcel Energy has promised to pay property taxes through 2040.

Zach Swearingen, the chair of the board, defended Pueblo’s role in clean energy. “I think that Pueblo County has done a lot more than almost anywhere else in the state when it comes to the promotion of clean energy and renewable energy,” he said. “And our testimony is not really heard.”

Commissioner Miles Lucero said he shared Swearingen’s frustration. “Whether you’re a nuclear fan, whether you’re a fan of the renewable energy park — none of those things were really considered in their recent ruling, and I think that’s where the frustration stems from.”

But Lucero had another frustration. “The language that was submitted (to the PUC) in its version was not presented to this board,” he said, “and to me, that is a massive procedural error.”

Commissioner Paula McPheeters said that what was in the PUC filing on Aug 29 did indeed reflect what the commissioners had said would be OK. “The filing was exactly what I wanted it to say,” she said. She she she remembered raising her hand and saying it needed to go to the federal level, she added.

Pueblo, she went on to say, is like being on a fourth floor of a four-alarm fire. “I want a 20-foot truck to come save us. I’m not willing to negotiate down to 10 feet, because we’re going to die if we don’t get help.”

Colorado, said McPheeters, has given “given us the shaft.” “We have functioning clean coal plants right now that are working. I would accept natural gas if we can get that, but the PUC has basically given us no options here. It is not my job to sit back and watch the building burn and do nothing.”

McPheeters said she had contacted Pueblo’s representative in Congress (Jeff Hurd).

“We were promised a just transition. We’re getting just nothing. I’m not going to sit back and let that happen.”

Lucero said that frustration with the PUC does not mean that Pueblo wants to stay the course with coal.

“I was disappointed, like you, Dr. Campbell, to see that frustration come through in a filing like that. Conversations about what replaces Comanche have never centered on keeping coal burning. They’ve always centered on what comes next for this community.”

The request to keep Comanche operating indefinitely, said Lucero, is “not accurate.”

Unclear is when the conversation between the commissioners and their legal counsel in the case occurred.

Without Swearingen, the third commissioner, supporting Campbell’s plea for a repudiation, the statement by Pueblo County in the PUC filing stands.

For the background to this conversation in Pueblo on Thursday morning, see this story from Wednesday: “Will Trump try to keep coal burning in Pueblo?”

Top photo: Pueblo County website

Allen Best
Follow Me
Big Pivots

Subscribe to free Big Pivotse-magazine

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!